Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1434

reference
100-tree-1
name
1434
tree-preservation-order

undefined

100-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.003515 50.869267)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.003473 50.869263,-1.003475 50.869271,-1.003481 50.869279,-1.003490 50.869285,-1.003502 50.869289,-1.003515 50.869290,-1.003528 50.869289,-1.003540 50.869285,-1.003550 50.869279,-1.003556 50.869272,-1.003558 50.869263,-1.003556 50.869255,-1.003550 50.869248,-1.003541 50.869241,-1.003516 50.869236,-1.003503 50.869237,-1.003491 50.869241,-1.003481 50.869247,-1.003475 50.869254,-1.003473 50.869263)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL